Gold Nazi


Thanks for visiting Gold And Precious Metals. Remember to bookmark this page Gold Nazi.

%%title%%
1 OZ GOLD Layered Post Nazi German Bank IRON CROSS Third Reich Bullion Bar
$9.55
quality
%%title%%
1 OZ GOLD Plated Post Hitler Nazi Iron Cross German Central Bank WW2 Bullion Bar
$9.99
quality
%%title%%
1oz GOLD Platted Post Nazi Germany Iron Cross Third Reich Bullion Art Bar
$11.20
quality
%%title%%
Original WWII US Army Soldiers Find German Nazi Gold in Salt Mine Near Merkers
$2.99
quality
%%title%%
1 OZ GOLD Layered Post Nazi Iron Cross German Central Bank WW2 24k Bullion Bar
$9.99
quality
%%title%%
The Boys in the Boat Nine Americans Their Epic Quest for Gold in Nazi Germany
$13.49
quality
%%title%%
1oz GOLD Plated Post Hitler Nazi Germany Iron Cross 3rd Reich Bullion Art Bar
$10.25
quality
%%title%%
1 OZ GOLD Post Nazi Germany A Hitler Iron Cross German WW2 24k Bullion Bar
$12.00
quality
%%title%%
1 OZ GOLD Layered Post Hitler Nazi Germany Iron Cross German WW2 Bullion Bar
$8.99
quality
%%title%%
1 OZ GOLD Plated Post Hitler Nazi Germany Iron Cross German WW2 Bullion Bar
$8.99
quality
%%title%%
1 OZ GOLD Layered Post Nazi Iron Cross German Central Bank WW2 24k Bullion Bar
$9.99
quality
%%title%%
WW II Pro Nazi Swiss government Swiss Nazi Bank Conspiracy NAZI GOLD
$11.00
quality
%%title%%
The Swiss the Gold and the Dead How Swiss Bankers Helped Finance the Nazi
$3.00
quality
%%title%%
WW2 German 5 Reichsmark Third Reich Nazi 24K Gold Plated Coin
$2.25
quality
%%title%%
24K GOLD PLATEDNAZI GERMAN SWASTIKA COIN1 REICHSPFENNIG1937 A
$10.61
quality
%%title%%
1 OZ GOLD Plated Post Nazi Germany Iron Cross German WW2 24k Bullion Bar
$10.33
quality
%%title%%
Nazi fantasy gold plated coin 5 Deutfches reich 1938 coin
$15.00
quality
%%title%%
WW2 German 5 Reichsmark Third Reich Nazi 24K Gold Plated Coin
$1.02
quality
%%title%%
24K GOLD PLATEDNAZI GERMAN SWASTIKA COIN1 REICHSPFENNIG1937 A
$5.70
quality
%%title%%
Hitlers Silent Partners Swiss Banks Nazi Gold And The Pursuit Of Justice
$3.97
quality
%%title%%
Hitlers Silent Partners Swiss Banks Nazi Gold And The Pursuit Of Justice
$3.97
quality
%%title%%
Nazi Gold Hardcover w DJ By Ian Sayer Douglas Botting 1984
$6.99
quality
%%title%%
1 OZ GOLD Plated Post Nazi Hitler Germany Iron Cross German WW2 24k Bullion Bar
$14.00
quality
%%title%%
Germany WW2 Hitlers Nazi Gold set 1944 MLH
$2.99
quality
%%title%%
WW2 German 5 Reichsmark Third Reich Nazi 24K Gold Plated Coin
$1.00
quality
%%title%%
1 OZ GOLD Plated Post Nazi Germany Iron Cross German WW2 24k Bullion Bar
$11.00
quality
%%title%%
Rare Size M Mark 2x A 5 Nazi Coin 3rd Reich German 24k Gold PLT Dime US Lot
$0.99
quality
%%title%%
Nazi Gold The Full Story of the Fifty Year Swiss Nazi Conspiracy to Steal Billi
$3.97
quality
%%title%%
Israel 1995 Victory over Nazi Germany 10 New Sheqalim Gold NGC PF70 ULTRA CAMEO
$1,500.00
quality
%%title%%
Hitlers Gold The Story of the Nazi War Loot by Arthur L Jr Smith 1996
$5.40
quality
%%title%%
Zombie Hunter Decal Sticker Call Of Duty Black Ops 2 Nazi Zombies Gun lock Case
$4.99
quality
%%title%%
Nazi Gold to obtain reparations for Holocaust TV Week The Hartford Courant CT
$15.00
quality
%%title%%
RARE 24k Gold PLT Dime 2x RARE SIZE Mark F 5 Nazi Coin 3rd Reich German US Lot
$0.99
quality
%%title%%
1 OZ GOLD Plated Post Nazi Germany Iron Cross German WW2 24k Bullion Bar
$12.00
quality
%%title%%
24K GOLD PLATEDNAZI GERMAN SWASTIKA COIN1 REICHSPFENNIG1937 A
$1.25
quality
%%title%%
pbs frontline NAZI GOLD VHS VIDEOTAPE
$22.72
quality
%%title%%
Hitlers Silent Partners Swiss Banks Nazi Gold And The Pursuit Of Justice Vi
$7.99
quality
%%title%%
COIN POLAND 2009 2ZL JUDAICA NAZI GHETTO LODZ NORDIC GOLD STANDARD GE
$4.00
quality
%%title%%
Hitlers Gold The Story of the Nazi War Loot Arthur L Smith
$36.25
quality
%%title%%
American Spectator magazine May 1997 Roger Tamraz NRA Nazi Gold Wayne laPierre
$2.00
quality
%%title%%
The Search for Nazi Gold DVD
$3.25
quality
%%title%%
1937 1940 24K Gold Plated Nazi German 2pf Swastika Coin
$7.99
quality
%%title%%
1936 1940 24K Gold Plated Nazi German Swastika Coin
$7.25
quality
%%title%%
WW2 German 5 Reichsmark Third Reich Nazi 24K Gold Plated Coin
$0.41
quality
%%title%%
Nazi Coins J 1 + A1 3rd Reich 24k Gold PLT 1776 Quarter 1 4 Dollar German US Lo
$0.99
quality
%%title%%
WW2 German 5 Reichsmark Third Reich Nazi 24K Gold Plated Coin
$0.01
quality
%%title%%
All 4 Psa 1936 Jesse Owens Olympics 4 Gold Medal Tickets Nazi Germany Hitler
$850.00
quality
%%title%%
WWII Patriotic RARE Anti Nazi Victory Vermont Yanks Gold Hoard ONLY 16 MADE Z57
$300.00
quality
%%title%%
The Hunt for the Nazi Gold Secrets of the March Impromptu Code Revealed Hamme
$8.38
quality
%%title%%
The Swiss the Gold and the Dead How Swiss Bankers Helped Finance the Nazi
$7.00
quality
%%title%%
WW2 German 5 Reichsmark Third Reich Nazi 24K Gold Plated Coin
$0.01
quality
%%title%%
HELLBOY NAZI GOLD INGOT PROP REPLICA RESIN LIFE SIZE
$20.00
quality
%%title%%
NY Times 1945 Issue Patton Seizes Nazi Hoard of Gold
$150.00
quality
%%title%%
24K GOLD Plated WWII German 3rd Reich Nazi 2 Mark Coin SWASTIKA A BERLIN MINT
$0.01
quality
%%title%%
Nazi Millionaires The Allied Search for Hidden SS Gold by Theodore P Savas
$9.00
quality
%%title%%
NAZI GOLD
$24.99
quality
%%title%%
TIME TUNNEL 2 Gold Key 1967 D Day World War 2 Nazis Custer s Last Stand TV
$19.90
quality
%%title%%
1 OZ GOLD Layered Post Nazi Hitler Germany Iron Cross German WW2 24k Bullion Bar
$12.00
quality
%%title%%
1 OZ GOLD Layered Post Nazi Iron Cross German Central Bank WW2 24k Bullion Bar
$9.99
quality
%%title%%
NAZI GOLD IN NEW HAMPSHIRE NOVEL SIGNED AUTOGRAPH BOOK E G CURTIS COA
$11.09
quality
%%title%%
NAZI Deutsche Reichsbank Third Reich German Hitler WWII Unique set bag coin gold
$900.00
quality
%%title%%
Oct 28 1996 Time Magazine And God Said Clintons Character Nazi Gold
$4.00
quality
%%title%%
NOT RATED 1 Oz 999 24k Unified Germany Post Nazi THIRD REICH WW2 Gold Clad Bar
$9.88
quality
%%title%%
HITLERS SILENT PARTNERS SWISS BANKS NAZI GOLD THE PURSUIT OF JUSTICE HARDCOVE
$7.00
quality
%%title%%
The Swiss the Gold and the Dead How Swiss Bankers Helped Finance the Nazi
$17.55
quality
%%title%%
Finance Banks Markets Newspaper 1933 USOFF GOLD STANDARD + GERMANY HITLER NAZI
$24.95
quality
%%title%%
Got Zombies Decal Sticker Call Of Duty Black Ops Nazi Zombie Gun Case Cabinet 2
$4.99
quality
%%title%%
1936 Berlin Olympics Jesse Owens Gold Medal Nazi Salutes lithograph
$59.99
quality
%%title%%
Treasure World Magazine January 1973 metal detecting WWII Nazi Hitler gold loot
$7.50
quality
%%title%%
Nazi Gold A Message Of Love Vinyl LP
$12.00
quality
%%title%%
Nazi Gold by Tom Bower Hardcover NEW Swiss Nazi Conspiracy Holocaust
$2.00
quality
%%title%%
NAZI GOLDFIFTY YEAR SWISS NAZI CONSPIRACY1997Tom Bower1st EdIllustDJ
$14.99
quality
%%title%%
HISTORY NAZI GOLD TOM BOWER H C D J 1997
$6.85
quality
%%title%%
Hitlers Silent Partners Swiss Banks Nazi Gold And The Pursuit Of Justice
$3.00
quality
%%title%%
Nazi Germany Third Reich Gold Schmiede Kunst 12+88 Stamp WW2 Nazi Era 5
$0.99
quality
%%title%%
Nazi Gold A Message Of Love LP texas post punk night birds hardcore 2012 us EX
$10.99
quality
%%title%%
Male Lie Detector POLYGRAPH Nazi Gold BEDFORD INCIDENT Forgotten Night Warrior
$22.99
quality
%%title%%
LARRY THOMAS BUTCH PATRICK DUAL GOLD AUTO 5 5 MUNSTER KID SEINFELD SOUP NAZI 1 1
$55.00
quality
%%title%%
Nazi Gold The Full Story of the Fifty Year Swiss Nazi Conspiracy to Steal Billi
$3.97
quality
%%title%%
Nazi Gold by Tom Bower 1997 Hardcover
$14.95
quality
%%title%%
The Swiss the Gold and the Dead How Swiss Bankers Helped Finance the Nazi War
$6.95
quality
%%title%%
Lost Treasure 3 98 Nazi Gold Hidden In USA Confederate Treasure Nugget Shooting
$3.95
quality
%%title%%
Nazi Gold by Ian Sayer and Douglas Botting 1991 Hardcover
$4.99
quality
%%title%%
Hitlers Silent Partners Swiss Banks Nazi Gold and the Pursuit of Justice
$14.95
quality

Gold Nazi

NAZI GOLD!!! | Chris Kendall

Let's die killing americans!

LET'S DIE KILLING AMERICANS!

By Stanley Collymore

The last time that the United States of America entered a war principally out of humanitarian concerns and for altruistic reasons was its own civil war when one of the primary objectives of that war, even though this was something of an afterthought, was the emancipation of black slaves in that country; every other war that the United Sates has subsequently been engaged in, many of which it deviously and illegally initiated itself, were enthused by the profit motive and on the behalf, often singly so, of corporate business interests.

This is a far cry from the widely perceived laudable incentives that gave rise to the earliest settlements by white Caucasian Europeans on this arbitrarily renamed by them North American continent and, more significantly, the very much later creation of the United States of America.

Those earliest Caucasian settlers who braves the uncertain dangers of the Atlantic Ocean and landed in North America were exclusively refugees fleeing violent and persistent persecution in their own home countries and to such an extent that they felt it incumbent upon themselves to travel thousands of miles away from the European countries and people they belonged to, to a completely unfamiliar and alien continent to them on the other side of the world in order, let's not forget, to be physically, mentally and religiously free of the iniquitous harassment that was systematically and horrendously being directed against themselves at home by their own people.

But even more important and crucial in the facilitating of this process of providing and securing a new homeland for these fleeing European refugees was what transpired after they made landfall on the North American continent. For were it not for the altruistic assistance that was given to them by the Native Americans, help that exclusively enabled these prospective settlers to withstand and ultimately survive the unaccustomed privations and extremely harsh American wintry conditions they were initially subjected to, but who they and later waves of their white kith and kin that followed them nevertheless treacherously saw fit to wreak their genocidal tendencies on and steal a continent from, there would have been no white settlement of the North American continent, at least not in the then foreseeable future and most certainly no United States of America as it's presently constituted.

Similarly, the creation of the United States of America out of a small group of thirteen disparate colonial entities, one of which the Colony of Carolina was founded by Barbadians in 1649 when a group calling itself the Barbadian Society of Gentlemen Adventurers set off north from that Caribbean island and opened up the Carolinas, even of the first twenty one governors of which as were two in Massachusetts were all Barbadians, has significantly been influenced by Barbados and the North American colonies' close association with this West Indian island that played a crucial logistical, practical and historical roles in the formation of what became the United States of America, indisputable facts that are either unknown to the overwhelming majority of US citizens and residents because they're not taught in America schools or tertiary educational institutions; not promulgated in the US media by even an iota of the degree to the extent of the coverage given to holocaust incidents, real or imaginary, and their biased interpretations by the largely fascist, pro-Hitler but post World War II conscience-pricked, expediently holocaust-contrite broadcasters and media owners like Rupert Murdoch; or because these relevant facts pertaining to the authentic creation of the United States of America have no place and therefore don't or won't ever feature in the scheme of things, not least their fallacious rewriting of North American history, of the tiny but none the less highly influential cohort of fanatical, diehard Zionists that currently and for some time now have determined both the domestic and foreign policies of the United States of America.

So it's really laughable to see the likes of the intellectually challenged, socially graceless Sarah Palin who nevertheless has extravagant ambitions to become President of the United States of America – how the mighty has fallen! – ally themselves bigotedly and zealously 235 plus years later with the North American colonials who dumped several bales of tea into Boston Harbour because of the injustices which they genuinely perceived were being inflicted on them by their English colonialist master George III of England, thus giving rise to the iconic expression "The Boston Tea Party", forming a stalking horse, Republican party orientated, political faction and ludicrously giving it the name The Tea Party, when those who're deeply mired in this piece of political propaganda, wearisome chicanery and customary disinformation haven't the foggiest notion of the real origins of or, for that matter, the true motivations behind the actions of those dissidents directly associated with the events which led to the much celebrated, and not only in US history I must point out, Boston Tea Party.

A situation which is compounded by the fact that Sarah Palin and her ilk who are jumping on this particular bandwagon are either at best second generation Americans themselves or for the most part firmly belong to the flotsam and jetsam of Europe's couldn't-wait-to-get- rid of them castoffs or possibly their US born offspring, who made it to the land of the free before Hitler's gas ovens switched to maximum capacity or else luckily managed to survive these and ended up post World War II in America in common with many Nazi and Waffen SS mass murderers from both western and communist Eastern Europe who swopped their real identities for those that they'd gassed, murdered and knew quite well, because previously and before the outbreak of World War II they were neighbours and even close friends with them; or to boot, despite the US administration and law enforcement agencies knowing who they were and precisely what they'd done, officially allowed them to enter and even greatly assisted them in moving to the United States simply because they were anti-communist.

So don't be fooled by these shameless interlopers into thinking and even worst believing that they have any longstanding or even committed ties with the United States. Quite frankly they don't, and any such claims should be readily and roundly dismissed in the same way that one would if a Mexican of wholly Spanish ancestry asserted that just because he or she now lived in Mexico, might even have been born there and ran that country that gives them the right to falsely claim that it was their forbearers who created the Aztec Empire and as such they are the inheritors of it. I know what many of you would make of that; so why then do you tolerate and even permit a dimwit like Sarah Palin to convince you that she and others like her have direct and indivisible links to the Boston Tea Party, pre-US creation dissidents of that period in North American history?

The real and motivational links to the Boston Tea Party dissidents stem for outside the North American continent, one thousand miles south in the Caribbean Sea on the island of Barbados. Their famous and inspirational cry of "No Taxation Without Representation" is as Barbadian as rum, which was invented there: the world's first and oldest rum is Mount Gay, is. To best understand and moreover appreciate how this is so and why these North American colonials arrived at their unanimous decision to borrow this uniquely Barbadian slogan for their cause I'd like to refer you to the circumstances that preceded and included the Treaty of Oistins in 1652, signed between the Barbados Parliament: created in 1639 and is the second oldest after the English House of Commons in London, England making it much older that the formation of Germany 1871; Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the USA 1776; Belgium, Italy, Finland, the Soviet Union and many other well-known countries, past and present, and Oliver Cromwell the then Lord Protector and ruler of England.

Even more important than the abovementioned slogan that was borrowed from the Barbadians is the indisputable fact that the American Declaration of Independence, which has a familiar ring to all Barbadians, is a direct crib of the Barbadian Declaration of Independence that was drafted over 150 years earlier; now with the thirteen North American colonies seeking their independence from England much discussion undoubtedly took place over the matter between the Barbadians and the US Founding Fathers, one of whom was a prominent, very influential, much liked and deeply respected Barbadian who was tipped for the presidency of the United States of America until George Washington, who had his eye firmly on that post, stuck his oar in and with the narrowest assistance from some of his associates got them to insert into the US Constitution, ironically and notwithstanding that this was a 100 percent  Barbadian document, the well-known codicil that to become President of the United States of America one had to be born on American soil. Clearly George Washington, even though the Bajan in question didn't want the job, saw no contradictions in terms with the two issues. Even so there was no friction from the Barbadian side over the issues that came up and the initial 13 colonies that went on to form the United States of America were quite happy to use the tenets of Barbados' Declaration of Independence, and the Barbadians had no objections to them doing so, as the guiding light and principles: social, political, fiscal, religious and moral, of their progressive way forward. And not only was one of the signatories of the United States Declaration of Independence and its Constitution a Barbadian, the printer of these original and historical documents was also a Barbadian.

Therefore, for the benefit of those of you who are either genuinely ignorant of these facts or ostrich-like would prefer to bury your heads in the barren sands of cultural, historical and political revisionism I would like to earnestly implore you to give the crude, racist, fascist, hard right, libertarian and Zionist crap of the following a miss - Sarah Palin: idiot of the millennium; Senator John McCain: the arch lecher whose perversions and sexual abuses of women make those of the recently convicted Israeli president, Moshe Katsav, now serving seven years behind bars look like minor misdemeanours, the only difference being that John McCain had immunity to do what he did and get away with it because of who his father and grandfather were; Ex-Californian governor and Austrian Nazi, Arnold Schwarzenegger; Joe Lieberman: the least said about this political schizophrenic and tortured man the better; and the wolf in sheep's clothing Senator and big-time loser Senator John Kerry: a first generation American born to Jewish refugee parents to the US that concealed their Judaism and expediently converted to Christianity to spare themselves the virulent anti-Jewish sentiments which were rampant in the United States at the time, but never told John when he came along what they'd done leaving him to find this out for himself, little wonder that the poor sod is psychologically so confused about everything from his politics to his identity – and check out the real facts and circumstances that genuinely contributed to the creation and fostering of the United States of America; and not deal in fantasy. Not if you want to be properly informed that is.

In Black Rock: a sedate, seafront suburb of the Barbadian capital Bridgetown, there's a 386 year old archive centre replete with among other things a comprehensive history of colonial North America; events and circumstances leading up to the US Declaration of Independence; post independent USA and the close links that not only successive Barbadian governments but equally important its people  have had over three centuries in a diversity of roles from colony creator to inspirational political mentor  with what is now the world's sole superpower, but crucially for the researcher, whether that person is a professional in this line of work or an amateur indulging his or her personal hobby, incorporating data that was contemporaneously written down plus the original documents that relate to the period of time they are specifically referring to; in other words a veritable treasure trove of priceless information.

And while it would also be a most glorious opportunity to avail yourself of the ideal holiday in a truly Caribbean and paradisiacal environment, if for whatever reason this isn't possible there are many reputable links that one can easily and reliably check out on the internet through the appropriate search engines at your disposal including, of course, Google to get the relevant information that you're after; or have corroborated the facts I've stated in this article or others that you've come across in your own detailed research. Realistically I can only give you a few pointers in this direction to begin with but I'm absolutely sure that these will provide you with a cornucopia of riches that will whet your appetite for more.

Invaluable links are: 1) The Treaty of Oistins; 2) George Washington in Barbados; 3) The Barbadian Society of Gentlemen Adventurers 1649; the creation of the Carolinas; 4) USA-Barbados Ties; 5) Rabbi Marc Lee Raphael on Jews and the Slave Trade; 6)The Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews, Volume 1, Rabbi Marc Lee Raphael; 7) Jews in Barbados (by the way the oldest synagogue 1654 in the entire Americas and Caribbean regions is in Bridgetown, Barbados and is a UNESCO World Heritage Site;  8) British History, Empire and Sea Power – Slavery and Economy in Barbados, Dr. Karl Watson; 9) The Barbados – Carolina connection by Warren Alleyne and Henry Fraser; 10) The first Jews in Barbados, and the first migration of Jews from Barbados to the North American mainland; 11) The Barbados Parliament, 1639; 12) Barbados links with England; the original Trafalgar Square and Lord Nelson Statue, older than London's by far and located in Bridgetown, Barbados' capital.

I referred earlier but only briefly to the Johnny-come-lateleys to the United States and who not only act as if they alone have exclusive rights to run and control that country but asininely as well give the impression that this has always been the case, but these are the very same people who've managed with comparative success and massive US military firepower and its nuclear capability to blackmail major parts of the rest of the world into believing that their biological and ideological kith and kin imbued with their implacable Zionist philosophy are equally the rightful inheritors and owners of historical Palestine, which they most definitely are not! But when you're consistently immune from having to face up to the consequences of your criminal and inhuman activities and can with absolute impunity do whatever you like and get away with it, then it's hardly surprising that for those concerned the truth becomes whatever it is that they want it to be.

There's no doubt that the United States of America in spite of the inspirational encouragement and active participation given to it by the government and people of Barbados in 1776 to use for its political and civic purposes the latter's Declaration of Independence: incontestably the most politically succinct and citizens-compliant document in the entire world then, afterwards and right up to the present time, has since then lost, despite becoming a major world power, a great deal and arguably some would say all of its moral and political compass that that Bajan document conferred upon it in 1776, and that the United States voluntarily opted to shoulder and readily did so with great aplomb.

The road to hell it is said is often paved with good intentions and it has been no different with the United States of America which shortly after attaining its independence from England went on to commit an act of unforgivable treachery and dastardly proportions.

To man their fledgling navy in their fight for independence from England the high command of the future US state had gone to great lengths to recruit a number of North African Moors from Morocco, which incidentally was the first country in the world to recognize the newly created USA and exchange ambassadors with it. Legendary for their seafaring skills these black North Africans who'd conquered the Iberian Peninsula in the 8th Century AD that they then went on to rule, passing on their maritime expertise to the Spanish and Portuguese and were chosen as principal navigational officers for Christopher Columbus' epic trans-Atlantic voyage in 1492, excelled in their pro-US maritime exploits against the English and contributed vastly to the English ultimately throwing in the towel and granting their 13 North American colonies their independence; but as soon as this was achieved an ungrateful USA had these free men, who'd done stalwart service on their behalf, summarily arrested and thrown into slavery, which then was a booming economic enterprise on the North American continent as elsewhere in the rest of Americas and the Caribbean.

Reminds you of anything; more contemporary US betrays maybe, like those involving Manuel Noriega, Al-Qaida and Saddam Hussein? To name just three examples of other such acts of shameless perfidy on the part of the United States where it has callously used people for its own ends then remorselessly disposed of them when they've done its dirty work and it ha no further need of them; although the black North African Moors could hardly be said to belong in the same league as the aforementioned trio of scoundrels.

Ever since its inception in 1776 right up to the present time, April 2011, the United States has by hook or by crook devised, initiated and waged more wars globally and against a greater number of countries than any other country on earth, and significantly these wars have always had a largely racist element to them, since the overwhelming majority of them have been against either non-white sovereign states or other non Caucasian entities. Let's examine this assertion more carefully before we move on. The only white countries that the United States has gone to war with are: 1) England, to gain its independence; and then it wasn't a country but very much 13 North American colonies; 2) Spain, to land grab and expand the territorial space of the United States by nicking land from Mexico and grabbing control of Spanish territories in the Caribbean, notably Cuba and Puerto Rico, and the Pacific Ocean, as was the case with the Philippines; 3) Imperialist Germany in the First World War; 4) and Nazi Germany in World War II.

Even then the US was a very late entrant to World War II, not least because the vast majority of its population, all of its business and financial corporations, and practically all of Congress were Nazi supporters, and had the Japanese not bombed Pearl Harbour, ironically at the behest of Germany, there would have been no US military involvement in World War II; that's not the same as saying that there wouldn't have been any participation by the United States in that war, far from it, since the United States until its abrupt but involuntary, military contribution to that war was doing phenomenal commercial  and financial business with Nazi Germany. The US president, one of just a tiny minority of US establishment figures at the time who favoured that country's involvement in Europe's war but literally had his hands tied and could do nothing to facilitate helping the opponents of Nazism in Europe couldn't believe his luck though when US intelligence informed him of the pending Japanese attack on Pearl harbour. His direct response: do nothing to prevent it; wait until the attack occurred, and then like the load of ignorant sheep that his fellow country and its self-serving moronic Congress members were manipulate both factions into fighting their righteous war that only a short while previously they were all dead against; and the strategy worked brilliantly, as all subsequent strategies of duping the great ill-informed US public by successive Presidents including the joint presidencies of Dick Cheney and George W. Bush and that of Barack Obama and the CIA have been.

The upshot of it all was that the US did get involved in World War II with the sacrificial lambs of pearl Harbour's expendable dead, deliberately served up on the altar of expediency, the sole means to facilitate this. Still the president and the small core of pro-Europeans apart, it didn't stop these American Nazi turncoats who had vehemently opposed an US military participation in World War II from arrogantly postulating that it was they who had saved Europe, giving rise to false belief that Europe and especially Britain must eternally be grateful as a consequence of this for what they did. What a bloody joke! The help which the US gave to Britain came with a massive price tag; some help, some friend! And taking into account that the Second World War ended in 1945 it was only a few years ago, 2006 I believe, that the United Kingdom eventually managed to pay off this crippling loan debt with substantial interest in the bargain that it agreed to as a condition of the US getting involved in World War II's European theatre of war. And I don't know of anyone in my circles of friends who if any of us got into difficult straits would have as a friend someone who questionably only came to our assistance simply because they knew they could make a profit out of doing so. How about you?

In marked contrast colonial India (there was no Pakistan or Bangladesh then) provided over 2 million servicemen: the largest contingent of volunteer military forces in the entire history of mankind; Africa, including Kenya (Did you know this Mr Barack Obama?) and the Caribbean colonies collectively among themselves contributed hundreds of thousands of other servicemen to fight in this internecine European war. And guess what pals? None of them after the war saw it financially or mortally appropriate to bill the UK for a single dime for having helped fight its war. As I stated earlier they were all volunteers from the then British Empire; the same people that after the war ended successfully for Britain Winston Churchill would condescendingly and ungratefully, and fortified by his well-known, endemic racism publicly state ought not to have any place in the United Nations, which in his words wasn't intended for subject peoples. This despite the fact that as colonials they could quite easily have opted to do what the Republic of Ireland, part of the British Isles, did and publicly at any rate stay out of the war, when in effect they were enthusiastic collaborators with the Germans working on the age old precept that my enemy's enemy (there's no love lost between Ireland and England for good historic reasons) is my friend. This collaboration was such a headache for Winston Churchill that he even wanted to have Ireland invaded until reminded that he hadn't defeated Germany yet and the intractable and interminable war with Ireland: physical, psychological and religious, that had gone on for centuries would only get infinitely worse.

No such ravenous appetite on the part of the same Winston Churchill though to tackle let alone have prosecuted at the Nuremburg Tribunals - he vetoed this suggestion on the grounds that it would look bad on the victors of World War II to be seen to have Nazi war criminals on their side and take some of the gloss off their sanctimonious self-congratulatory victory parade - the members of Das Deutche Freikorps, or German Free Corps. Never heard of them? I'm not the least surprised by that and for some of the above stated reasons, the combination of which none the less permitted these mass killers to go back unmolested into western civvy street. However for your illumination I'll give you a brief explanation of who these people were; and if you'd like more information check with the German Nazi Archives. They were all white Caucasians from Canada, the United States, Britain, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand and every part of the white colonial world that voluntarily went to Germany to fight for the Nazi cause and in that country were constituted into a foreign wing of the Waffen SS, not unlike from those from the Ukraine and the Baltic States of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia. They were in concentration and death camps and as escorts for many senior Nazi political figures.

Yet in spite of clear, unadulterated facts which state categorically that what Britain post-war is doing is wrong it still sycophantically continues to push its head up the ass of the Americans, prostituting itself in every way like a clapped out whore because it has lost an empire, which was inevitable any way as is the manner with all empires, and either can't or won't because of its fixated imperialist and colonialist mindset look for a much more meaningful and moral role to play in the world, preferring instead to be the night club bouncer of a somewhat dodgy night club proprietor, in this particular case the arrogant, wholly immoral, decadent and blackmailing nuclear bully called the United States of America, just so it can pathetically and embarrassingly carry on deluding itself that it's still a significant power on the world stage.

So we know now that the brave United States rarely kicks white asses and does so only when it has no other choice; so neighbouring Mexicans by this perverse logic of the sons and daughters of Uncle Sam are consequently fair game to be lawlessly and gratuitously gunned down by any white, US gun toting psycho should that Mexican try to cross into territory that was once theirs before there were even Caucasian settlements on the North American continent let alone a state called the USA, but was taken from them by the same United States of America that is working overtime to keep them out. White, Caucasian, Canadian citizens or residents though, regardless of where the hell they come from, have no such problems though and can freely cross into the US as and when they like. Similarly, the United States regularly and systematically bullies the developing world into not having any nuclear weapons or WMDs of their own but which in its own case it has aplenty, often updates and sure as hell has no intention of ever relinquishing no matter what the Non Proliferation Treaty says. Furthermore, along with Britain, France and the other members of the White Boys Club called NATO: The North Atlantic Treaty Organization that Turkey was co-opted into being a member of as a direct consequence of the Cold War and because it had a land border with the USSR and so the west desperately needed it on side but if NATO were created today Turkey would not have been given a look in, all have nuclear cover as well, so don't let then spin you the yarn about other white countries being nuclear free.

NATO should have been made obsolescent when the Soviet Union collapsed and the Warsaw Pact dissolved; that was the raison d'être we were all led to believe for NATO's very existence, acting as a counterweight to the Soviet Union. Now gratuitously at the instigation of the United States it has arbitrarily expanded both its sphere of influence and its operations well beyond its specific and original remit to North Africa it would appear; and in such circumstances if I were Colonel Gaddafi or whoever takes over from him I would request member of NATO for Libya as well and see what these white European Caucasian buggers have to say about that; but as we all know the unequivocal response to even a lightheaded request like that would be to piss off. For if the likes of Germany's Angela Merkel and France's Nicolas Sarkozy don't want Turkey, half of whose territory lies in Europe, to be a member of the European Union there's fat chance of any African country being part of NATO plans, regardless of where NATO shifts its borders to, other than being a fuc-ing firing range for testing out its latest weapons.

None of this should come as a surprise to anyone familiar with the track record of savagery of United States of America. Genocide is in its DNA as any Native American will testify to, that is why it was wholeheartedly behind Das Dritte Reich until bounced by Japan into World War II. Both of George W. Bush's grandfathers were deeply involved with Nazi Germany; one was the international banker for Adolf Hitler's Nazi Party while the other supplied the zyklon B gas that was used in the Nazi's death camps. Now the descendants of these bastards and others of their ilk who profited from the mass slaughter of Jews, Gypsies (still persecuted in democratic European Union Europe but dissimilar from the Jews got bugger all for their near annihilation from the face of the earth while practically nobody ever talks about them when the holocaust is discussed), homosexuals, the handicapped, communists (the Americans would like this bit) and German socialists , who now run the US, never mind who is president, and are living the life of Riley off of the proceeds and investments this blood money want to go even on better and have us believe that they not only paragons of virtue  but also have an omnipotent right because of who they are  to tell the rest of us across the world, even people like me who have no wish to visit let alone live in the United States  how we should conduct and live our lives.

In 1823 just 47 years after it came into existence the United States throwing its weight around as we have unfortunately too often seen in contemporary times rather arrogantly and arbitrarily declared through the Monroe Doctrine that all of the Americas as well as the Caribbean were its backyard essentially; that it could do whatever it liked in these regions, and always did; and that no outside power could have a look-in let alone set up bases in these regions, a policy that brought us to the brink of war in the Sixties when the Soviets set up what the US claimed was a nuclear site on the Caribbean island of Cuba. Cuba is 90 miles of the coast of the USA and the US argument was that such a Soviet Union military base located there even at the invitation of the Cuban government posed a threat to its own sovereignty, conveniently and as always quite dishonestly overlooking relevant counter arguments, namely that the US had military bases in Turkey that had a land border with the Soviet Union and these bases were abounding with US nuclear weapons. A classic case it would seem of what's good for the US gander in the eyes of that country not being equally so for the Soviet goose.

Today the United States has military forces and bases in over 200 locations around the world; more locations than there are member countries of the United Nations. What the hell for? Is this not insecurity, paranoia and an obsessive power complex exhibited in a quite extreme and alarming fashion? Name me off the top of your head another country that does that? You can't because there is none. And why on earth any country should want to have military bases of any kind outside its own territorial borders beats me. Isn't the creation of military forces primarily for the defence of a country and the very moment that that country starts moving them around the world as if they were draughts on a draughts' board, and moreover persuading likeminded allies or else threateningly blackmailing or bullying weaker states into providing it with bases that it craves or grandiosely wants to have for whatever perverse reason it might have in mind it inevitably causes friction, distrust and ultimately wars and needless conflicts? And the stark dishonestly about the United States doing this is that its laws expressly forbid foreign troops of any description, even from the friendliest of countries to the United States from being billeted on US soil let alone that country providing bases for them. And if as the US idiotically claims the Americas and the Caribbean are its backyard how in the name of Jehovah does oppressive Bahrain: a tiny inland in the Gulf Region that like the myriad of other dictatorships there that pass themselves off as sovereign states but are in reality artificial creations of the British and French under the Sykes-Picot Agreement (check it out) following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, get to become the "HOME" of the US Fifth Fleet? Unless the Americans are privy to something that the rest of us don't know, I was always under the impression that Hawaii was the only offshore state of the United States of America; but hardy US watchers know why it is there, and it sure as hell has nothing to do with democracy or universal human rights.

I would also like draw your attention to the fact that the military budget of the United States is significantly greater than the combined military budgets of all other countries in the world. No, it's not an exaggeration. Go check it out! That, I'm positive you'll agree, is by any definition a hell of a lot of money to be spending on armaments particularly when 33 millions of your own population are without any sort of health care; this in conjunction with all the other calamities that we're completely aware of in relation to contemporary USA. But it's really nice and heart-warming to see that the President, Congress, the military, judiciary, civic and financial entities, CIA and even the US population at large have all got their priorities right; as I'm sure you can recall those purportedly popular peoples' protests that vehemently opposed any changes to that absolutely fantastic, patients-compliant, US heath care system from what it evidently is to God forbid some kind of socialist, un-American system which, horror of horrors, actually puts the interests and medical wellbeing of the patients before corporate health insurance profits.

Meanwhile, in marked contrast to the Fascist Empire that the United States has become and by all accounts clearly revels in being since those halcyon days when with the massive assistance of Barbados it metamorphosed from being the 13 backwater North American, English colonies that it consisted of to become the independent, sovereign entity known and recognized as the United States of America, Barbados has stuck tenaciously to the enlightened principles which it espoused and believed in when it defeated Oliver Cromwell's English Navy and compelled him at the Mermaid Tavern in Oistins in Barbados in 1652 to sign the Treaty of Oistins which the independent USA incorporated almost wholesale into its declaration of independence.

Sensibly, constructively, maturely and with an immense insight to its own future, progressive development and enhanced well-being of all its citizens and residents Barbados has moved leaps and bounds forward, though never forgetting its roots and core values or how these came about in the first place, to become an ultra-modern, decidedly stable, economically responsible, socially integrated, exceedingly well educated, physically healthy, robustly progressive, totally adult suffrage and citizen-empowered democracy with a religious and moral compass which is second to none. The island for example has a well established, outstanding educational system that goes back to its creation as an exclusive English colony in 1627; education which is highly competitive but universally free from pre kindergarten to postgraduate university level and is carried out in a diversity of educational institutions, notably at secondary level in 17th Century established grammar schools that by far predate the creation of the United States of America.

Furthermore, few countries in the world have attained Barbados' educational profile according to data published by UNICEF; in fact the only countries which matched Barbados were Eastern European former communist countries such as the Ukraine, Latvia, Slovakia, Poland, Slovenia, Belarus, and Estonia. Moreover, in its annual report on the state of the world's children in 2004 UNICEF stated that the adult female and male literacy rates in Barbados are 100 percent, much higher than those of the US and UK which as so-called advanced, developed countries languish in the low 70s figures and are falling annually. A phenomenal 85% of girls and around 80% of boys in Barbados habitually go to university or into tertiary education, and females play major roles in Barbados' private and public sectors as in parliament and the Civil Service. Significant numbers of Bajan females serve in the judiciary, in all areas of the education spectrum and as career diplomats; and the first ever female to be accredited to the United Nations was from the island of Barbados; she later went on to become that country's Governor-General. And in spite of Barbados being a sovereign, independent state and as a monarchy with Queen Elisabeth the Queen's official representative on the island. Her name: Dame Anita Barrow.

Americans will doubtlessly have heard of the late Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm: the first female elected to the US House of Representatives and a pioneering female candidate for the presidency of her country, long before anyone had even heard of Bill Clinton let alone his wife Hillary. And though born in the USA, Shirley Chisholm by dint of both her parental and wider family links to Barbados was, because of the island's longstanding and very distinguished track record educationally, sent to be schooled there, and is on record as having said that without the educational standards, social and religious ethos and cohesion which she was freely exposed to on the island he life and career had she remained instead in the United States would have been vastly different and less productive than was it was. But Shirley Chisholm wasn't at all unique in getting an education and having it free in Barbados as it is not only a political but a citizenry consensus as well that every foreign born national who is a descendant of Barbadians and who even lives outside of Barbados is legally entitled as all Barbadian citizens and residents to have their education free in Barbados, something that many UK born, Barbadian descended students regularly avail themselves, and to the immense betterment of their personal lives, of. And one has only got to examine the quite shallow and incomprehensibly stupid political statements of the likes of Hillary Clinton and Madeleine Albright who merely wanted full acceptance as one of the rather nasty boys that in male dominated USA they found themselves surrounded by and persons like Shirley Chisholm and Dame Anita Barrow that not only had a meaningful grasp of the real political issues of the day, as apart from contrived ones, but also and more significantly had the personal gravitas and unflinching authority that was derived from the extensive respect they justifiably earned to deal with these.

But education is just one of several other areas that Barbados excels in. The island also has a fully functioning, comprehensive and universally free from cradle to death health care system and along with Cuba whose own well renowned health care system beats that of the US hands down, Barbados per population has more live and physically active centenarians than any other country in the entire world. So how is it that these two Caribbean countries at either end of the Caribbean Sea and with different political systems, one of whom has been under an iniquitous decades long siege by the United States, have excelled to the overall benefit of their respective people in ways that the US with currently 21 million people on food stamps, hasn't dreamt of and evidently has not been able to match?

The simple and honest truth is that while socially responsible countries like Barbados and Cuba quite naturally invest in their people intentionally structuring in the process a fully all-inclusive and cohesive network of citizens and residents that instinctively identify with their country and each other and, additionally, are consensually of the opinion that they have both a national duty as well as a personal obligation to unremittingly push forward the boundaries of their country's social, educational, health and political advancement, there's no such consensus in the US. Not least because the United States of America, unlike Barbados and Cuba, isn't a nation at all but rather a loose collection of disparate, self-serving entities that consist of several homogeneous ghettoes, some of them immensely rich others dirt poor, wedded together by a common greed, where altruism is widely seen as a manifestation of weakness and the profit motive is God. A system of untrammelled selfishness, social aridity and financial misfeasance: the latter having been routinely propped up by a morally indefensible, patently corrupt, obsolete and evidently bankrupt capitalist system whose precept of dog eats dog has unsurprisingly benefited only the few at the ruinous expense of the vast majority that have had to involuntarily endure the many attendant consequences, and has contributed immensely to many of the needless problems that now bedevil the world.

The United States which has been in the vanguard of all of this with Britain obsequiously in the role of principal cheerleader has regrettably been able to get away with what it has been doing because of its military might based largely on its nuclear capability; a capability though that is as Nazi based as the Third Reich itself. For it was German Nazi scientists spirited away at the end of World War II to the United States who developed and vastly expanded the US nuclear industry as well as that of its space explorations. Many, although not all of them, were loosely described as Jews even though there were many secularists and nonbelievers among them; but the reason why Germany which had the technology for the aforementioned breakthroughs long before the US, Britain, Russia and France made theirs, all of them exclusively so with ex Nazi and particularly German Nazi help, was Adolf Hitler's reluctance to embrace it. Imbued with a purblind hatred of most things "Jewish" although there were many Jews and Mischlinge: those of mixed Jewish and Gentile origins in the German armed forces some of them holding senior command positions, Hitler adamantly refused to take on board this new technology that wasn't wholly attributed to 100 per cent Aryan authorship. Had he not been so lacking in discernment and had allowed Germany to develop the world's first atomic bomb that it had every capability of doing and at a time when the rest of the industrialized developed world, including the United States was lights years from conjuring up let alone achieving any such thing, the same goes for the space industry, there's more than wishful thinking that with Britain about to lose an empire that new mantle with its attendant aspirations of world hegemony would not have fallen to the United States but rather to Germany. Was denkt ihr ueber dass Nordamerikaner?

Here though are just a smidgen of the catalogue of the crimes that the United States which likes to self-righteously portray itself as the guardian of democracy, universal human rights and sees itself as the world's self-appointed policeman have gratuitously and violently committed on the global stage and that in many cases, both individually and collectively, make the crimes of Das Dritte Reich look decidedly as child's play. They aren't in chronological order nor have I given them any preference over each other; you will have to decide how you perceive them.

The dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The lame excuse always given by the United States is that it was necessary to do this in order to save the lives of thousands of its servicemen as the Japanese would not have surrendered and would have fought to the last man. The truth is that Japan was at the point of collapse and actually suing for peace. The US though needed a pristine, homogenous environment to test its new toy and be better able to monitor the results from having done so; Japan provided that environment. Just as importantly the United States would not have dropped those bombs on Germany which was a greater threat to world peace because Germany was white and Caucasian.

The overthrow of the democratically elected Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadeq by the CIA paving the way for the installation of the autocratic and murderous Shah. Mossadeq's crime? He wanted to use Iran's oil for the benefit of the Iranians not BP's predecessor Anglo Iranian, or that of the UK and the USA. QED: He had to go!

Against the advice of his Foreign Secretary who from firsthand experience warned him not to recognize Israel or have any truck with the enclaves of fanatics in the Middle East President Harry S. Truman didn't listen. The United States is now reaping the whirlwind of that act of rank stupidity on the part of Harry S. Truman and particularly for supporting the Zionist entity Israel whose paranoia and barbarism are both inimical to the national interests of the United States which is universally hated. Only one prominent US figure has had the balls to publicly say this and that is General David Petraeus. He ought to resign his commission and challenge Barack Obama for the presidency.

The Chagossians, summarily without any consultation with them (why bother they are black?), violently and totally ethnically cleansed from and thrown off their Indian Ocean islands home in the 1960s in a secret deal between the UK government and the US administration so that the United States could build a military base there, which it still operates. Successive British courts including Britain's highest, the House of Lords, have consistently ruled that the islanders have every right to return to their country from which they thrown off and are prohibited from even visiting by premeditated and persistent US pressure on successive British governments not to acknowledge or act on any of these court rulings (so much for the US's adherence to the rule of law), and that the UK meekly bends the knee to using an archaic statute, the Royal Prerogative that goes back centuries to James the First's of England belief in the Divine Rights of Kings to circumvent the rulings of modern 20th and 21st Century courts.

Operation Condor, the baby of Henry Kissinger a German Jew who missed his birth country's Final Solution celebratory bash because he was in the United States (what a pity!), where the US led the way in the extermination of tens of thousands of South Americans and thought it quite proper and in order to overthrow democratically elected rulers like Allende in Chile and replace him with odious dictators like Pinochet, all in the name of stopping communism from infiltrating America's alleged backyard it was dishonestly claimed by the United States. The souls of those that were tortured and murdered in the most brutal of circumstances, those that are euphemistically referred to as The Disappeared still cry out for justice but Henry Kissinger is still alive. Quite frankly I just cannot understand how it is that people like Henry Kissinger and other Jews like Madeleine Albright while absolutely demanding that the rest of the world should be contrite about their kith and kin that came to sticky ends in the Third Reich's death camps can be such arrogant and vicious savages to other people. Kissinger's perfidy aside who can forget Madeleine Albright's comments about the one million Iraq children who died as a result of US led sanctions against that country, when she publicly said that their deaths were worth it. What a hateful, unfeeling bitch!

The Gulf of Tonkin incident; some incident! This was the United States acting as classic agent provocateurs and creating, as their Israeli buddies would say, circumstances on the ground, but in this case led to the Vietnam War that the United States premeditatedly provoked and the lost of lives of millions of South East Asians and scores of thousands of US servicemen personnel.

Staying in the Far East and more specifically in Vietnam we had the My Lai massacre, said by the US at the time, having tried for some considerable time to suppress all reporting of it to be a few rotten apples and not at all representative of the US armed forces. Since then we've had Bagram, Abu Grahib, Guantanamo Bay, extraordinary rendition, CIA outsourcing of torture to Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and even Syria (no one could have made that up), as well as CIA torture gulags in Eastern European and even EU states like Poland. Now the latest debacle is finding out that in Afghanistan, the United States private firing range, US soldiers have with the full awareness of their military units and commanders been gratuitously killing Afghans for sport, planting weapons next to their dead bodies then claiming they were terrorists, while they took to posing with these unfortunate victims of theirs as their equally brutal ancestors did with both murdered Africans and their big game, using these photographs and body parts as trophies to take home for civilized family discussions. When I'd like to know will the US stop giving us all this load of tosh about a few rotten apples and acknowledge that it's the whole barrel called the USA that is rotten to the core?

The ousting and killing of the democratically elected Patrice Lumumba of the Congo who the Americans, Belgians and French had tortured and his dismembered body cast to the African winds then putting the tyrant Sese Seko Mobutu in his place. Similar campaigns were waged by the US against the democratically elected government of Dr. Cheddi Jagan of what was then British Guiana, now Guyana, with the Americans ordering the British, Guyana was a colony then, to send troops into the country and remove Jagan, which the British meekly acquiesced to, put a pliable cat's paw Forbes Burnham in his place and give rise to many years of racial and political turbulence in what is undoubtedly one of South America's richest countries with innumerable sources of precious natural resources from gold to bauxite to oil. The Americans didn't inform Maggie Thatcher of their plan to do the same thing in the tiny Caribbean island of Grenada and that greatly upset her, but the plan was the same as that carried out in the 1950s in British Guiana, to remove any government that had close diplomatic relations with Castro's Cuba. And a measure of the American bully is that Grenada that has no air force or navy kept the mighty US at bay for in excess of a week and did inflict some casualties on them as well as damage to some of their military assets. Good for them!

The CIA downing of Cubana Flight 455 in 1976 and the US downing of Iranian Flight 103 in 1988, both were civilian planes with passengers on board, all of whom perished. Luis Posada Carriles who along with other CIA accomplices that brought down that Cubana plane from Barbados to Jamaica with many Barbadian student doctors on board lives as a free man in Florida, while the captain of the US naval ship operating illegally in Iranian waters and that premeditatedly brought down that airline was decorated. But to listen to repulsive bunch of hypocrites in Washington that routinely and dismissively dupe their foreign affairs ignorant population into believing what they're told and which rarely has any semblance of the truth at all to it one could be rather forgiven for thinking that Pam Am Flight 103 which came to grief over Lockerbie was the only such incident of its kind; and even then there are several reliable sources and analysts who categorically claim it was a CIA agent provocateur assignment.

Then there's the quite infamous CIA run School of the Americas where every US backed and supported tyrant from Chile to the Philippines and many other locations in between have been painstakingly (no pun intended) schooled in the craft of dictatorship along with the CIA's own individual operatives, all of them lustily singing from the same hymn sheet and to the tune of Germany's Third Reich where much of these rather unsavoury aspects of human nature were codified. Yet the US would dearly like to see the Iranian Revolutionary Guards branded and outlawed as a terrorist organization. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

One seventh of the entire population of the Philippines was killed by the United States when Filipinas decided to live in an independent country of their own and wanted the US to leave.

Most of those in Guantanamo Bay, whose lease the United States can and does renew without ever having to consult any Cuban government, and who hail from Afghanistan were victims of the Northern Alliance: bounty hunters paid by the United States with rival political or financial interests to those they conspiratorially sold to the US, something the US has known from the very outset.Not a single one of them has subsequently been convicted of any terrorist related activities as there's nothing against them; but the paranoia, overt racism, we are never wrong mindset, and rank stupidity of the US Congress, the US Supreme Court – configure the letters of the word Court by removing the letter O completely, replacing the letter R with N, add S on to the T and in the new word you've created will have a much more fitting description of what the prefix "supreme" ought really to relate to as far as these corrupt bastards who fix elections, remember 2000, and haven't a clue what judicial probity is all about - the Pentagon, US State Department, Attorney General and those in the White House are in such a tizzy about and are so implacably opposed to these propel being tried in civilian courts as with a jury they would certainly on non-existent evidence be found not guilty; opting instead for them to be lynched in military tribunals, dishonestly stating that they would pose a security risk if they were tried in civilian courts when what they really mean is the world and the US public would see them all for the lying ass-h-les that they are. What security threat? And to what – the barbarism of those that delude themselves they're the guardians of everything that's moral. Give us a break! And anyway, how can a non-combatant be realistically tried in a military court? Answer that one Susan Rice; Hillary Clinton; Robert Gates; and Mr President! Or has the cat got your tongues?

Dick Cheney and George W Bush had to convince the US public that non-existent evidence existed, as for all their pressure and that of the neo-cons there was no hard evidence of a link between Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaida or WMDs. The method employed was simple says Maria Ryan of Nottingham University in England: "If you mention Iraq and Al-Qaida in the same breath enough times people will start to associate those two things. And if you look at opinion polls the majority of Americans thought that there was some relationship between Iraq and Al-Qaida; there never was any substantive evidence of that. What there was, was a whole lot of assertions from the US president and vice president and members of the cabinet that the two were someway connected and Saddam Hussein had these large stockpiles of WMDs. This worked on the premise that if you say something often enough people will believe it."

The situation in Bahrain is one of a non-native, foreign import masquerading as a royal family, not dissimilar to what was done to the Greeks when the "royal family" they had imposed on them from Germany and Scandinavia were very unwelcomed there and ultimately kicked out, that is usurping the democratic and human rights of the native Bahraini people who want, like the Greeks with theirs, simply to be rid of this unrepresentative, out of touch, self-serving and savage bunch of camel fu—ers and run their own affairs by themselves and for the interests of their own people, not this murderous lot, the US and its western allies. But in typical dishonest fashion the United States along with Saudi Arabia is portraying it as a sectarian conflict that is instigated by Iran, which it most definitely is not. But using the Dick Cheney principle that the Obama administration has taken on board the bigger the lie and the more frequently you use it the more likely it is that people, and Americans in particular, will believe it.

Which raises a rather pertinent question; why is it okay for the members of what is essentially an all White Boys Club, NATO to instinctively come to the support of each other along with their antipodean kith and kin in New Zealand and Australia regardless of the circumstances of the matter but wholly inappropriate and wrong for Iran to champion the cause of repressed and oppressed Shias in Bahrain or eastern Saudi Arabia who are demanding their legitimate human rights and the democracy that the west takes for granted, and with whom Iran prior to and even after the Sykes-Picot carving up of the Middle East by Britain and France has always had close ties with, taking into account that Iran is situated in the region, which can't be said for the US or any of these other western states, and is a neighbour of Bahrain and Saudi Arabia?

Barack Obama and the White House have ordered the US and foreign western media operating in the United States like the BBC not to cover events in Bahrain. They've all readily complied with this request but not because they love Barack Obama, actually they all hate him and detest him with equal passion as they do the fact that a mixed race black man or any person other than a white Caucasian should be President of the United States of America. So why then have they submissively fallen in line, kept their mouths shut and not reported on the far worst slaughter in Bahrain as compared to what is happening in Libya where their position is markedly different; taking into account that the domestic and well as the foreign media is attacked and harassed in Bahrain while there are many western crews operating in Libya even though a few of of them are complaining that they don't have the complete freedom to go where they want to in Libya. Did they during the Falklands War when there was a total news black out by Maggie Thatcher; or in Iraq or Afghanistan when they were either embedded with or had to be shepherded about by US and western minders? But it's really necessary from the perspective of the US military and industrial complex not to rock the boat, so the US and foreign western journalists do what they are told.

The United States has to date spent over 6 trillion dollars on its nuclear weapons alone. Just as important in this equation is that the US Congress supports, as it did again on April 6 2011, this obscene spending on nuclear weapons that can wipe out the entire world several times over and more besides; however US Congress which is wholly, corruptly and inescapably in the pockets of the arms lobbyists know which side their financial bread is buttered on and to hell with what their constituents think; as these venal bastards don't have a conscience.

The United States has openly forgiven Saudi Arabia for 9/11; many of the 9/11 attackers were Saudi Wahhabi fanatics, the very people which the government of Saudi Arabia pays scores of millions of US dollars yearly to, to export their vile sectarian creed and pander to their savage propensities and bloodlust. So who then are we supposedly fighting; where are all these rather intransigent terrorists if the real ones have been forgiven and presumably are rehabilitated? Yet western citizens are being lied to and allow themselves to be duped by the US and other states in the so-called west into actually believing that we're all under the constant and perilous threat of terrorism. The truth is they're using the bogeyman of terrorism with its attendant perception of fear as an effective mechanism of control. Have the citizens feel that they're threatened and they'll agree to anything they're told by these lying governments and power control freaks that run the countries involved. Meanwhile the real power brokers: those who run the industrial and military complex can go into overdrive to boost even further the enormous wealth of the 1% of the US population, comparable figures also exist in the EU, that controls 99% of the country's financial assets.

The Obama administration disingenuously for public consumption, domestic political reasons (there's a presidential election in 2012) and the fact that all US administrations are composed of pathological liars is barefacedly giving its incredibly gullible population and the rest of the world the dishonest idea that the US is no longer actively involved in the Libyan campaign but if asked to assist in an emergency by NATO will accede to that request. That is a load of bull and you don't have to be an interpreter of body language to judiciously conclude that Hillary Clinton is lying from every corner of her mouth. On the contrary the US is still very much in charge and what is more, is conducting from the shadowy background it has opted to occupy for the moment a rather nefarious plan of its own. The idea is to divide Libya. So NATO at the behest of the US will periodically bomb Colonel Gaddafi's forces that on the face of it allows the insurrectionists to advance; then when this happens NATO will intentionally withdraw in the sure knowledge that this rag tail bunch of nonentities will be beaten back; and so the game will be played out until the US and the west has both sides where they want them. A standstill with the US and west unopposed to take control of the oil rich east of Libya its cat's paws not able to do anything about that and a rump western Libya that they won't give two hoots about and that Colonel Gaddafi can have until the cows come home. That way the oil companies of the west will be happy as there will be ample supplies of even cheaper oil flowing to it and the United States will be able to use its part of occupied, and even a Kosovo-type Libya to control the political developments in neighbouring North African countries to the exclusive benefit of itself, its Zionist, apartheid, enfant terrible and all those western states that got involved in the feeding frenzy around Libya.

Selective and quite disingenuous military intervention in Libya but none whatsoever in Bahrain or the Yemen where the murderous brutality taking place there with the help of Saudi Arabia – the most democratic state in the world, I don't think – is with United States permission allowed to use Bahrain and Yemen as shooting galleries and their citizens as expendable clay pigeons; and once again we see the real face of the United States and its corporate military complex in full pelt, with President Obama, whose paternal Kenyan relatives have firsthand experience of torture at the hands of Ian Henderson who is and has been for sometime, ever since the British took him from Kenya after that country's independence to Bahrain to become chief torturer to the Bahraini ruler, has most ironically given explicit instructions to the US media not to cover the Bahraini people's protests and the quite savage response to these by the dictator there and his invading, foreign allies.

Poor Barack Obama! His demons relate to his father and the circumstances of his own birth. Born to a black African father and white American, Caucasian female in Hawaii, this union of his parents, had it taken place in mainland USA instead of in Hawaii, a virtual colony as it then was of that country, Mrs Obama would have been charged under the United States' immorality and race laws and sent to jail while her husband, Obama's father, would have been arrested on statutory rape charges for marrying and being in an illegal union a white woman, found guilty and sentenced to death and executed. Having seen his father a veteran of World War II who'd fought for Britain, like several thousands of Kenyans and other Africans had voluntarily done in that campaign, tortured and humiliated by the likes of Ian Henderson now doing the same in Bahrain, for asking that their country be given back to them by Britain which had stolen it and Kenyans be allowed to rule themselves, Obama senior, having been humiliated by the British himself and having now emigrated to the explicitly racist United States to study wasn't in any mood, a situation not dissimilar from that faced by many sensible black men who chose white wives, to countenance racism in any shape or its guises, hence the breakdown of his marriage.

So President Barack Obama is like many similar mixed race kids that sadly find themselves caught up in the dilemma he subsequently found himself in; brought up by a white and usually disgruntled mother, hersel

About the Author

Stanley Collymore is an Academic, Journalist and Writer.

If you are looking for a different item here are a list of related products on Gold And Precious Metals, please check out the following:

Gold Nazi

Frequently Asked Questions...

Did the Catholic Church assist in Nazi hidings?

Is it true that the Vatican accepted gold/art work in return for the safe haven of Nazi officers in Argentina? Anyone else have an opinion on the matter? I just heard this recently so I'm interested in the historical relevance of it.


Answer:

Why don't you conduct some real academic research from reputable sources instead of asking for people's non-objective opinion? Do you really think you will get accurate historical information on a forum like this?

wordpress plugins and themes automotive,business,crime,health,life,politics,science,technology,travel